Abstract: Super-platform autonomy is a new type of private power characterized by the integration of public and private interests. Its legal attribute differs from both state public power and the traditional civil rights enjoyed by ordinary market entities. From the perspective of protecting the rights and interests of operators within the platform, an analysis of the formation mechanism and behavioral manifestations of the abuse of super-platform autonomy reveals that the current legal regulatory framework in China still faces institutional deficiencies and application challenges. In response, constructing a dual governance path that combines anti-monopoly regulation with industry regulation, and links pre-regulation with post-remedy, is a reasonable choice and feasible solution for regulating the abuse of platform autonomy and safeguarding the legitimate rights and interests of operators within the platform. The optimization and improvement of anti-monopoly rules should adhere to two major principles: adapting to innovation and strictly defining boundaries. It should regulate emerging monopolistic behaviors based on the characteristics of the digital economy while avoiding excessive regulatory expansion. As for the construction of China's platform industry regulatory system ,it should be rooted in the realities of domestic platform economic development and should establish distinctive arrangements in terms of regulatory authorities, regulatory contents and legal effects that differ from those of the EU’s Digital Gatekeeper regime.