无人驾驶情形中刑事责任认定

    Dilemmas and Pathways in Determining Criminal Liability in Autonomous Driving Scenariose

    • 摘要: 无人驾驶汽车不具有刑法上的辨认和控制能力,也不具有刑罚可罚性,不是适格的刑事责任主体。无人驾驶汽车的使用者属于乘客,也不承担刑事责任。无人驾驶情形中,主要由汽车生产者、所有人、管理人和远程安全员承担刑事责任。无人驾驶汽车生产者由于不是道路交通参与者,不构成交通肇事罪,主要涉及产品责任犯罪与过失人身犯罪。在因果关系判断时宜采取反向排除规则;不宜引入严格责任,而应坚守罪责原则。至于汽车所有人、管理人主要在驾驶前负有检查义务和软件更新义务;而远程安全员则在驾驶时负有接管义务,在事故发生后负有报告义务。违反相关义务进而造成他人重伤或者死亡的,无人驾驶汽车所有人、管理人和安全员应当承担相应的刑事责任。

       

      Abstract: Autonomous vehicles lack the capacity for discernment and control, and thus are not subject to penal culpability, disqualifying them as appropriate subjects of criminal liability. Users of autonomous vehicles, classified as passengers, also bear no criminal responsibility. In scenarios involving autonomous driving, criminal liability primarily falls on vehicle manufacturers, owners, managers, and safety operators. Manufacturers, not being direct participants in road traffic, do not constitute the crime of causing traffic casualties but may be implicated in product liability offenses or negligent personal injury crimes. Strict liability should not be introduced; instead, the principle of culpability must be upheld. However, a reverse exclusion rule should be adopted in determining causation. Vehicle owners and managers are obligated to conduct pre-drive inspections and software updates, while safety operators are responsible for takeover during operation and post-incident reporting. Violations of these duties resulting in severe injury or death shall subject owners, managers, and safety operators of autonomous vehicles to corresponding criminal liability.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回