论普殊同对马克思劳动范畴的再阐释

    On Moishe Postone’s Reinterpretation of Marx’s Category of Labor

    • 摘要: 普殊同对马克思劳动范畴的再阐释强调两点:劳动并非超历史的人类活动,而是具有历史特殊性的社会形式;抽象劳动并非观念概括,而是现实抽象,它构成资本主义社会抽象统治的关键环节。由于忽略马克思在生产关系层面对劳动过程的分析,普殊同割裂劳动的自然规定和历史规定的有机关联,未能把握劳动形式转化的根本前提在于资本主义私有制。这些理论不足与其方法论在继承黑格尔辩证法过程中所呈现的理论偏重与局限密切相关。重新基于马克思的历史唯物主义而非一切外部方法理解现实抽象,才能在抽象与具体的辩证统一中推进政治经济学批判的具体化,激活其对资本主义社会本质的解释力与批判力。

       

      Abstract: Moishe Postone’s reinterpretation of Marx’s Category of Labor mainly emphasizes two points: first, labor is not a transhistorical human activity but a social form with historical specificity; second, abstract labor is not conceptual generalization but real abstraction, constituting the core mechanism in the abstract domination of capitalist society. However, by neglecting Marx’s analysis of the labor process at the level of relations of production, Postone severs the organic relationship between the natural and historical determinations of labor, failing to recognize that the transformation of the form of labor is fundamentally premised on capitalist private property. These theoretical shortcomings are closely tied to the inherent biases and limitations of his approach. A renewed understanding of real abstraction grounded in Marx’s historical materialism—rather than in external interpretive frameworks—enables the critique of political economy to advance through the dialectical unity of the abstract and the concrete, thereby revitalizing its explanatory and critical power in revealing the essence of capitalist society.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回