父母离婚后子女与父或母共同生活的确定——以民法典编纂为背景审视《婚姻法》第36条

    Determining with Whom the Child Should Live after Parents Divorce—Examining Article 36 of Marriage Law in the Background of the Civil Code

    • 摘要: 《婚姻法》第36条和最高人民法院《关于人民法院审理离婚案件处理子女抚养问题的若干具体意见》对父母离婚后子女与父或母共同生活的规定存在不足之处,在司法实践中导致了一定的问题。中国婚姻家庭法中应当明确规定儿童最佳利益原则,同时将子女本位的立法思想渗透到亲子关系的各项制度中。结合儿童最佳利益原则的细化标准与中国现有经验,确定离婚后子女与何方共同生活时,应当根据个案事实综合考量各项相关因素。相关法律术语应当由“抚养”改为“共同生活”。基于此,在立法论层面,中国民法典婚姻家庭编编纂时应当对现行法律规范的相关内容进行修正和完善。

       

      Abstract: Article 36 of Marriage Law and the Supreme People's Court's "Special Opinions on the Treatment of Children's Raising in Divorce Cases by People's Courts" are relatively imperfect in terms of who a child should live with after parents divorce, which leads to certain problems in judicial practice. The principle of children's best interests should be clearly defined in Marriage Complication. At the same time, the legislative ideology of the child-based principle should be infiltrated into various systems of parent-child relationship. Combining the refinement criteria of the principle of best interests of children with the existing experience in China, relevant factors should be considered based on the facts of individual cases when determining with whom a child should live with after parents divorce. The legal terms shall be changed from "custody" to "living with". Based on this, the relevant legal regime and statutory provision should be improved in the Marriage Complication of the Civil Code.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回