高功率密度柴油机机体−气缸盖结合面密封性能多目标评估

Multi-objective Evaluation of Sealing Performance for High-Power-Density Diesel Engine Block-Cylinder Head Joint Surface

  • 摘要: 基于层次分析法(AHP),构建了柴油机机体−气缸盖结合面密封性能的目标-准则-指标评估模型,根据实际专家打分分别构建了目标-准则、准则-指标的判断矩阵,计算获得了4类设计指标参数对于总体密封性能目标的权重,并结合组合体应力特征的有限元分析,实现了6组不同方案的密封性能精确量化排序. 以某型V10高强化柴油机为例的计算结果表明,密封垫片中气孔的环向应力波动幅度最为显著,应力峰值可达19.42 MPa,反映出气孔环向应力不均性更为突出;水孔、油孔的应力分布更趋均匀,环向各点应力多集中于15~20 MPa 区间;油孔1的平均接触应力最大,达19.42 MPa;水孔2的平均接触应力最小,为15.04 MPa,反映了油孔1区域承受更强的载荷作用. 在6组组合方案中,准则层与指标层密封性能排序均为方案6密封性能综合最优,方案4最差,验证了评估模型准则层和指标层与实例模型计算结果的一致性且符合密封物理规律与工程经验.

     

    Abstract: Based on the analytic hierarchy process (AHP), this paper constructs an objective-criterion-indicator evaluation model for the sealing performance of the engine block-cylinder head joint face in diesel engines. Judgment matrices for the objective-criteria and criteria-indicators were established according to actual expert ratings, and the weights of four types of design parameters relative to the overall sealing performance objective were calculated. Combined with finite element analysis of the assembly stress characteristics, precise quantitative ranking of the sealing performance for six different design schemes was achieved. Taking a certain type of V10 highly reinforced diesel engine as an example, the computational results indicate that the circumferential stress fluctuation around gas holes in the gasket is the most significant, with the peak stress reaching 19.42 MPa, reflecting more pronounced non-uniformity of circumferential stress around gas holes. The stress distribution around water holes and oil holes is more uniform, with circumferential stresses mostly concentrated in the range of 15–20 MPa. Oil hole 1 exhibits the highest average contact stress of 19.42 MPa, while water hole 2 shows the lowest average contact stress of 15.04 MPa, indicating that the region around oil hole 1 bears stronger loading. Among the six assembly schemes, both the criterion layer and indicator layer evaluations rank Scheme 6 as having the best overall sealing performance and Scheme 4 the worst, verifying the consistency between the evaluation model (criterion and indicator layers) and the instance-based computational results, which aligns with the physical principles of sealing and engineering experience.

     

/

返回文章
返回