面向人工智能系统的跨层级安全漏洞分析与量化建模

Cross-Layer Security Vulnerability Analysis and Quantitative Modeling for Artificial Intelligence Systems

  • 摘要: 针对人工智能(AI)系统因高复杂性与跨层耦合性而产生的安全威胁,提出一种跨层级安全漏洞的量化分析方法. 该方法构建一个涵盖硬件、网络、基础软件、数据、模型算法、智能体与应用层的七层技术架构,并结合漏洞库数据系统性识别各层脆弱点. 建立一个由威胁传导概率模型(TCPM)、风险扩散强度模型(RDIM)和防御成本效益模型(DCEM)构成的耦合建模体系. 该体系分别用于量化威胁在层级间的传播概率、评估风险沿攻击链的扩散强度,以及测算不同防御措施的成本效益. 对1 841个AI相关漏洞的统计分析表明,中高危漏洞占比达65.2%. 以英伟达容器工具包(CVE-2024-0132)漏洞为例的案例验证显示:该漏洞从基础软件层向上传导的概率均超过0.96;经逐层放大后,应用层的最终风险强度达到0.922,属严重风险;在3种防御措施中,针对源头的容器补丁升级成本效益比最高,为0.052. 结论表明,该模型体系能够有效揭示AI系统中的风险放大效应与关键防御节点,为制定精准、经济的安全防护策略提供了定量决策依据.

     

    Abstract: To address the security threats arising from the high complexity and cross-layer coupling of Artificial Intelligence (AI) systems, a quantitative analysis method for cross-layer security vulnerabilities in AI systems was proposed. firstly, a seven-layer technical architecture was established covering hardware, network, basic software, data, model algorithms, intelligent agents, and application layers, and systematically identifies vulnerabilities at each layer by integrating vulnerability database data. A coupled modeling system, comprising the Threat Conduction Probability Model (TCPM), Risk Diffusion Intensity Model (RDIM), and Defense Cost Effectiveness Model (DCEM), was developed to quantify the probability of threat propagation across those layers, evaluate the risk diffusion intensity along attack chains, and measure the cost-effectiveness of various defense measures. Statistical analysis of 1 841 AI-related vulnerabilities reveals that medium-to-high severity vulnerabilities account for 65.2% of the total. A case study on the NVIDIA Container Toolkit vulnerability (CVE-2024-0132) demonstrates that the probability of this vulnerability propagating from the basic software layer upward exceeds 0.96 at each stage. Following progressive across-layer amplification, the final risk intensity at the application layer reaches 0.922, categorized as a critical risk. Among three defense measures, patching and upgrading the container at the source achieves the best cost-effectiveness ratio of 0.052. The conclusion indicates that this modeling system effectively characterizes the risk amplification effects and identifies critical defense nodes in AI systems, providing a quantitative basis for formulating precise and economical security strategies.

     

/

返回文章
返回