热力耦合工况下发动机支撑肩多尺度泄漏率计算与参数优化

Multi-Scale Leakage Rate Calculation and Parameter Optimization for Engine Support Shoulder under Thermo-Mechanical Loading Conditions

  • 摘要: 为了探究热力耦合工况下支撑肩的密封失效规律,从宏观、介观、微观三个尺度开展研究,建立宏观尺寸发动机服役工况仿真模型、介观尺度支撑肩接触面磨损模型以及微观尺度流体泄漏模型,实现了服役工况和加工刀痕条件下泄漏率的精确计算. 基于多尺度分析模型,系统探究了初始预紧力、冲击载荷幅值、密封面摩擦因数以及缸体弹性模量对支撑肩泄漏率的影响规律. 最后,采用高斯回归模型和粒子群优化算法,对螺栓预紧力和载荷幅值进行了参数优化. 研究结果表明,初始预紧力和缸体弹性模量与泄漏率呈负相关,但是受接触面宽和接触应力的影响,随着冲击载荷和摩擦因数增大,泄漏率先增大后降低. 得到最优预紧力F=135.490 kN、最优载荷幅值p=28.944 MPa,此时的泄漏率为1.685×10−6 g/s,相比于实际工况下的泄漏率,下降了78.5%.

     

    Abstract: To investigate the sealing failure mechanism of the support shoulder under thermo-mechanical loading conditions, research was conducted across three scales: macro, meso, and micro. A macro-scale simulation model of the engine under service conditions was established, alongside a meso-scale wear model for the contact surface of the support shoulder and a micro-scale fluid leakage model. This integrated approach enabled precise calculation of the leakage rate under both service conditions and the influence of machining marks. Based on the multi-scale analysis model, the influence laws of key parameters on the leakage rate of the support shoulder were systematically investigated. The parameters included initial preload force, impact load amplitude, friction coefficient of the sealing surface, and elastic modulus of the engine block. Finally, Gaussian process regression (GPR) and particle swarm optimization (PSO) algorithms were employed to optimize bolt preload force and load amplitude. The research results indicate that the leakage rate exhibits a negative correlation with the initial preload force and the elastic modulus of the engine block. However, influenced by the contact width and contact stress, the leakage rate demonstrates a dynamic variation with increasing impact load amplitude and friction coefficient: it increases initially and then decreases. The optimization yields an optimal preload force of F=135.490 kN and an optimal load amplitude of p=28.944 MPa. At these optimal parameters, the leakage rate is 1.685×10−6 g/s, representing a significant decline of about 78.5%, compared to the leakage rateunder actual operating conditions.

     

/

返回文章
返回