梁土坤. 多维度视角下社会组织的农村反贫困效应[J]. 北京理工大学学报(社会科学版), 2021, 23(2): 69-80. DOI: 10.15918/j.jbitss1009-3370.2021.4047
    引用本文: 梁土坤. 多维度视角下社会组织的农村反贫困效应[J]. 北京理工大学学报(社会科学版), 2021, 23(2): 69-80. DOI: 10.15918/j.jbitss1009-3370.2021.4047
    LIANG Tukun. The Anti-poverty Effect of Social Organisation from the Multi-dimensional Perspective[J]. Journal of Beijing Institute of Technology (Social Sciences Edition), 2021, 23(2): 69-80. DOI: 10.15918/j.jbitss1009-3370.2021.4047
    Citation: LIANG Tukun. The Anti-poverty Effect of Social Organisation from the Multi-dimensional Perspective[J]. Journal of Beijing Institute of Technology (Social Sciences Edition), 2021, 23(2): 69-80. DOI: 10.15918/j.jbitss1009-3370.2021.4047

    多维度视角下社会组织的农村反贫困效应

    The Anti-poverty Effect of Social Organisation from the Multi-dimensional Perspective

    • 摘要: 社会组织等社会力量参与反贫困是现代社会通用模式。基于2017年度全国低收入家庭调查微观数据,运用Logistic和Probit回归模型,从服务可及性、主观贫困、未来生活信心三个维度对社会组织的农村反贫困效应及作用机制进行实证研究。研究发现:社会组织参与农村反贫困工作过程中存在社会服务种类少和社会服务可及性低的“双低困局”,并存在东部、中部、西部社会服务可及性顺次降低的区域非均衡发展问题,其反贫困效应受到严重制约。实际上,社会组织所提供的社会服务不仅能够显著降低农村贫困人口主观贫困,而且能够直接或通过主观贫困的中介作用间接地提高其未来生活信心。社会服务反贫困效应显著,凸显其作用的关键性。然而,残障康复、医疗保健、精神慰藉等不同类型社会服务的反贫困效应不同,凸显其影响的类型性。同时,社会服务对不同家庭类型贫困人口主观贫困和未来生活信心的影响效应也不尽相同,凸显其效应的家庭结构性。所以,必须根据社会服务的类型属性及家庭特征,采取相应对策进一步推进新时代反贫困工作可持续发展。

       

      Abstract: Social organisation participating in anti-poverty is a common method in modern society. Based on the micro data of the national low-income household survey in 2017, using Logistic and Probit regression model, this paper makes an empirical study on the Rural Anti-poverty Effect and mechanism of social organizations from three dimensions of service accessibility, subjective poverty and future life confidence.It found that, in the process of social organisation participating in the anti-poverty work in rural areas, there is a “double low dilemma” of few types of services and low access to services, and there is the problem of unbalanced development in the eastern, central and western regions, which seriously restricts the Anti-poverty Effect of social organisation. In fact, social services can significantly reduce the subjective poverty of the rural poor. Moreover, it can directly and significantly improve their future life confidence, and indirectly improve their future life confidence through the intermediary role of subjective poverty. From the perspective of subjective poverty and future life confidence, social services has a significant anti-poverty effect, highlighting the significance of its effect. However, the anti-poverty effects of different types of social services, such as disabled rehabilitation, medical care, and spiritual consolation, are different, highlighting the type of their effects. At the same time, the impact of social services on the subjective poverty and future life confidence of different family types is also different, highlighting the family structure of the Anti-poverty Effect of social services. Therefore, we must take corresponding measures to further promote the sustainable development of anti-poverty work in the new era according to the types of social services and family characteristics.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回