赵龙. 个人信息权法益确证及其场景化实践规则[J]. 北京理工大学学报(社会科学版), 2021, 23(5): 169-178. DOI: 10.15918/j.jbitss1009-3370.2021.1489
    引用本文: 赵龙. 个人信息权法益确证及其场景化实践规则[J]. 北京理工大学学报(社会科学版), 2021, 23(5): 169-178. DOI: 10.15918/j.jbitss1009-3370.2021.1489
    ZHAO Long. Confirmation of Legal Interests of Personal Information Right and Situational Practice Rules[J]. Journal of Beijing Institute of Technology (Social Sciences Edition), 2021, 23(5): 169-178. DOI: 10.15918/j.jbitss1009-3370.2021.1489
    Citation: ZHAO Long. Confirmation of Legal Interests of Personal Information Right and Situational Practice Rules[J]. Journal of Beijing Institute of Technology (Social Sciences Edition), 2021, 23(5): 169-178. DOI: 10.15918/j.jbitss1009-3370.2021.1489

    个人信息权法益确证及其场景化实践规则

    Confirmation of Legal Interests of Personal Information Right and Situational Practice Rules

    • 摘要: 个人信息权的语境实质是权利保护与个人信息利用二律背反的逻辑协调问题,是个人权利处分自由以及要求他人(包括国家)给予法益尊重的法律问题。在科学阐释个人信息权作为一项新型独立性权利的法理依据、理论内涵以及客体归属基础上,界定侵犯公民个人信息罪保护法益为个人信息权,明确个人信息权法益自决性立场,理性论证个人信息权一体两面的权利特征及其实践规则。方法论上将个人信息处理进行场景化审视,正确认识知情同意作为个人信息处理的合法性依据;明确相对同意作为权利主体同意的基本形态;强调真实同意作为权利主体的意思表达。原则承载价值,法律规制行为。作为二次规范法的刑法,理应在保护理念、条文结构以及罪名优化等方面给予回应,形成既具有理论逻辑自洽性亦彰显实践功能自足性的刑法结构样态。

       

      Abstract: The context of the right to personal information is in essence the logical coordination of the antinomy between the protection of rights and the use of personal information, as well as the legal problem of the freedom of disposition of individual rights and the respect of legal interests from others (including the state). In the scientific interpretation of the right of personal information as a new legal connotation, status and independence rights the right shape object ownership, based on the accurate definition of crimes of infringing upon the citizen personal information protection law profit as the right of personal information, discretionary right of personal information law benefit a clear-cut stand and reasoning the personal rights separated information characteristics and practice rules. The methodology of personal information processing is contextually defined, and the legitimacy of personal information processing is based on informed consent. To clarify the basic form of relative consent as the subject of right; Emphasis on genuine consent to the expression of meaning as the subject of rights. Principles bear value and laws regulate behavior. As a secondary normative law, the criminal law should respond to the protection concept, article structure and the optimization of charges, forming a criminal law structure with self-consistency of theoretical logic and self-sufficiency of practical function.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回